skills

automatic

• largely or wholly involuntary, especially as with a reflex
• acting or done spontaneously or unconsciously

automatize

• to make automatic [noun derivations: automatization the process of making automatic; automaticity the state or condition of being automatic]

Read the rest of this entry »

1. Deducing meaning and use of unfamiliar lexical items through understanding word formation and contextual clues in utterances and spoken text

2. Recognising and understanding phonological features of speech [especially those forms associated with supra-segmental features] Read the rest of this entry »

• Filling out typical forms
• Writing short factual texts explaining reasons for an action and [or] making simple recommendations
• Writing statements using principles of coordination and subordination

Read the rest of this entry »

• Listening to types of speech in different authentic contexts
• Listening to everyday speech and interactions
• Listening to and identifying single or multiple speakers
• Listening to both planned and unplanned speech

Read the rest of this entry »

• Developing ability to describe objects and processes
• Responding to various forms of questions and sustained questioning in appropriate contexts
• Interacting in real world speaking activities
• Performing one way and two-way information tasks
• Raising awareness of conversational structure [opening, turn-taking, sustaining a turn, negotiating meaning, nominating a topic, repairing a mistake, linking ideas, adjusting the message by rephrasing, or using circumlocutions, changing topics, & closing a conversation]

Read the rest of this entry »

In this post the classroom ideas are marked with a:

Whatever type of approach you intend to use for a particular activity in the classroom, making the differentiation between fluency and accuracy is a very important one.

However, here are some things to think about. From Brumfit…

• Just because we are talking about fluency, it does not mean that accuracy cannot be present. Accuracy is a focus on issues of appropriacy and other formal factors.
• Overuse of accuracy monitoring can cripple language development, making the students lose confidence through the teacher’s over correction.
• Any language activity that involves the learners not working like native speakers cannot be called a fluency activity.
  • The “quality” of the language is irrelevant.
  • Because:
    • work that focuses on language alone = accuracy work
    • and work that focuses on the language of the native speaker = fluency work.

Read the rest of this entry »

Some courses fail the learners in that they fail to distinguish between spoken and written language. The litmus test for this assertion is to ask whether the syllabus/curriculum treats spoken language as something distinct from written language with its own grammar, syntax and lexicon. If productive skills work is a vehicle for the teaching of structures rather than training for skill and sub-skill acquisition then the course would probably have to be described as a grammar based course, no matter how communicative it is hyped up to be.

Here then, are some of the features of spoken language as I have identified them. Read the rest of this entry »