speaking

You are currently browsing the archive for the speaking category.

Do you teach speaking with few or no materials? Here are some speaking activities that you can try with your classes. Read the rest of this entry »

Here are some more activities, some of which you can use with little or no prepararion. These are activities that I have found by dredging my computer directories. I there fore do not know the sources fo these activities. I would be happy to give any credit where it is due.

Lying: an icebreaker

air off students. It’s a good idea to pair off the students off oneself, as they might be a bit bashful in pairing off with a partner they don’t know. Read the rest of this entry »

Here is a suggested taxonomy for oral communication task types, not in any order of importance.

  • Providing extended answers to oral questions.
  • Asking and answering questions about diagrams or other visual representations of information.

Read the rest of this entry »

automatic

  • largely or wholly involuntary, especially as with a reflex
  • acting or done spontaneously or unconsciously

automatize

  • to make automatic [noun derivations: automatization the process of making automatic; automaticity the state or condition of being automatic]

Read the rest of this entry »

This is an activity that requires no setting up and can be done at the drop of a hat just the kind of activity that I love to have in my toolbox! Essentially, the idea is to promote automatization through quick responses, under moderately stressful conditions.

Aim: learners will recycle vocabulary and/or create short sentences under moderately stressful conditions.

Materials: none - don’t you just love it :)Read the rest of this entry »

  • Developing ability to describe objects and processes
  • Responding to various forms of questions and sustained questioning in appropriate contexts
  • Interacting in real world speaking activities
  • Performing one way and two-way information tasks
  • Raising awareness of conversational structure [opening, turn-taking, sustaining a turn, negotiating meaning, nominating a topic, repairing a mistake, linking ideas, adjusting the message by rephrasing, or using circumlocutions, changing topics, & closing a conversation]

Read the rest of this entry »

Speaking sub-skills


To complement the posts on speaking, especially regarding curriculum design, I have included a list of speaking sub-skills. Read the rest of this entry »

In this post the classroom ideas are marked with a:idea.png

Whatever type of approach you intend to use for a particular activity in the classroom, making the differentiation between fluency and accuracy is a very important one.

However, here are some things to think about. From Brumfit…

  • Just because we are talking about fluency, it does not mean that accuracy cannot be present. Accuracy is a focus on issues of appropriacy and other formal factors.
  • Overuse of accuracy monitoring can cripple language development, making the students lose confidence through the teacher’s over correction.
  • Any language activity that involves the learners not working like native speakers cannot be called a fluency activity.
    • The “quality” of the language is irrelevant.
    • Because:
      • work that focuses on language alone = accuracy work
      • and work that focuses on the language of the native speaker = fluency work.

Read the rest of this entry »

Some courses fail the learners in that they fail to distinguish between spoken and written language. The litmus test for this assertion is to ask whether the syllabus/curriculum treats spoken language as something distinct from written language with its own grammar, syntax and lexicon. If productive skills work is a vehicle for the teaching of structures rather than training for skill and sub-skill acquisition then the course would probably have to be described as a grammar based course, no matter how communicative it is hyped up to be.

Here then, are some of the features of spoken language as I have identified them. Read the rest of this entry »

This milling activity is very simple. Each student has a different sequential series written on a strip of paper. Their task is to find the participant wıith the exactly the same sequence as them self. For this to be a speaking and listening task, monitor the learners carefully to ensure they don’t show their sequences to people. Read the rest of this entry »