Communicative language teaching (CLT) is a label that is often used to describe courses and it seems to be a label that has become so over-used and easily used that it has perhaps begun to lose its meaning. When asked in a recent seminar what the characteristics of community language were, there did seem to be a definite reticence to offer answers. I found this somewhat surprising given the widespread use of the term.
What would happen to your school if it did not describe the courses given there are communicative language courses? Would you lose business? Would people automatically think that your courses were of a lower quality? What would happen to me as a teacher if I told people that I did not believe in the principles of CLL? Would I be cast out of the people friendly language teaching community? A outcast, a pariah?
But, if I am not confidently sure of what the principles or characteristics of CLL are, how can I claim to believe in them? I would be doing nothing better than paying lip service. Here then, is an attemopt at a taxonomy of the characteristics of CLL to guide my own assessment of my courses and teaching.
Read the rest of this entry »
Recent Comments