1954: The First Anthology of Flamenco

This first anthology was a collection of recordings of the basic flamenco forms of flamenco. This intention was more difficult than might appear at first sight due to the popularity of Opera Flamenco, and its most important representative: Pepe Marchena. A previous attempt had been made to preserve the old traditional otherwise known as the pure, unadulterated forms. This attempt was made by Manuel de Falla and Federico García Lorca in their ‘concurso de cante flamenco’ in 1922. However, this competition had little effect on the growing popularity of Opera Flamenco which obliterated any other interpretation that happened to be in its path.

Consisting of three twenty-five cms. records, this first anthology portrays a wide variety of cantes. The organizer of the records was the guitarrist Perico el del Lunar.

D.E. Pohren, in his book The Art of Flamenco, tells of the circumnstances that led to the making of this anthology:-

“According to Perico himself, when the french record company first approached him about the anthology he couldn’t believe they were serious. This was around 1950, when flamenco was still floundering badly. About the only artists working at that time were precisely Perico and some of the chosen singers on ths anthology, who were just at the beginning of what turned out to be their nearly permanent stint at La Zambra, a Madrid tablao set up with the help of the Spanish government in 1948 with the objective of showing tourists and Spaniards alike that flamenco still existed and was an art (La Zambra closed in 1973, due to the death of its owner and was the only flamenco tablao in the world at that time). It was at La Zambra that some french record executives first heard flamenco, and they became excited and decided that a flamenco anthology should be made. Perico laughed at them and told them that it would not sell. No one, but tno one was interested in flamenco. Without the subsidy of the Spanish governm,ent even La Zambra would surely have folded. The french insisted, and Perico figured what they hell, why not. But he slyly insisten on full payment at the time of the cutting of the records. None of this percentage stuff for an anthology that would sell ten copies with luck.

Perico worked like a demon. He could not find singers who knew some of the cantes he wished to include, so he, a walking encyclopedia of cante, taught them the cantes in question. In addition, due to his bad tendom, he could not play in the flashy style he thought the world would want.

The anthology was finally cut, and much to Perico’s surprise (mixed with a touch of dismay) it was an instant success.

The last time I say Perico, shortly before his death in 1964, he was still kicking himself: “that’ll teach me to be greedy, demanding a lump payment, and not a large one at that. I’d be getting rich off the percentage”. Then he would let fly a bit of colourful profanity, and we would resume the lesson”. (The Art of Flamenco, p.170).

As an immediate consequence to this anthology others were published. Some of these anthologies contain more than ten LPs. The record industry’s interest was awakened and for more than two decades the market was flooded with flamenco recordings.

Interestingly, Pericon’s son released an anthology of 3cds in 2002 which been widely welcomed as a positive contribution to the ‘discoteca’ of flamenco.

Related posts

Tags:

> (La Zambra closed in 1973, due to
> the death of its owner and was the
> only flamenco tablao in the world at
> that time).

Actually, the year 1973 was smack in the heyday of the tablaos. In that year, in Madrid alone, there were over a dozen, and they were packed every night. Successful tablaos also existed in Málaga, Granada, Sevilla and Barcelona in the seventies. By the end of the decade tablaos were in decline, partly due to the Paco/Camarón movement that flourished in other venues, and also due to the application of labor laws that made it much more expensive to contract artists, so groups dwindled from 10 or 12 people, to 4 or 6 at the most. It was then the “big format” companies became popular and began receiving government subsidies….and this in turn changed the entire face of flamenco……….

Estela Zatania
http://www.deflamenco.com/indexi.jsp

1973 was a little before my time
- I am 1966 vintage, but the Phoren information just did not ring true to me either as I do remember tablaos in Málaga and Sevilla in the early 1980s.

I agree with you about the Paco/Camarón movement and the increased availability of recorded media. In the various rastros, gas stations and street markets it was possible to pick up copies of cassettes of all artists at an incredibly cheap price - thereby saving the price of visits to tablaos…

I definitely agree with you about the business machine and politicisation of flamenco. There is a very interesting paper that tackles this idea of Patrimonio Cultural by Gerhard Steingress in which he examines the idea of official ownership of flamenco. While I do believe that the idea of promoting flamenco is an excellent idea, after all, here we are…

But so many of my friends in Andalusia do regard this official promotion of flamenco as another part of the “Flamenco Mafia” which assists in their exclusion as artists. That does not mean to say that they are all particularly reliable types!

Once again, thanks for your insightful contribution, Estela.

Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported